NH-0517 Rank 258

Tsuba · Ko-Kinkō

Chrysanthemum-shaped shakudō tsuba with nanako ground, a large pierced tomoe and a gold rinpō wheel; unsigned and attributed by an NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon paper to the Ko-Kinkō school.

TsubaMomoyama (1573–1615)Momoyama period (c. 1573–1615)NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon Tōsōgu

Description

Unsigned chrysanthemum-shaped (kikka-gata) tsuba attributed by its NBTHK paper to the Ko-Kinkō (古金工, Ko-Kinkō) school, the early soft-metal craftsmen who preceded the great flowering of the Edo period. The shakudō plate, with a fine and even nanako ground, is worked as an open flower whose petals radiate from the plain seppa-dai; a large pierced tomoe sweeps across the upper half, and a small rinpō (輪宝, rinpō) wheel, the Buddhist emblem of the Law, in gold iroe sits within a kagesukashi piercing. The rim is left in relief (sukinokoshi-mimi). The paper describes the work as sukidashibori, nikubori jisukashi, kagesukashi and iroe. The photographs show both faces and the rim: a dark, even patina, crisp nanako granules and intact gilding on the rinpō; the seppa-dai shows light mounting scuffs and the central opening retains small metal fillers (sekigane). The original seller places it in the Azuchi-Momoyama period and gives dimensions of 6.78 × 6.35 cm, 0.38 cm thick, 72 g; it comes in an uninscribed paulownia box. NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon Tōsōgu paper, no. 2012145, dated March 2026.

Strong points

  • NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon Tōsōgu paper (no. 2012145)
  • Shakudō with fine, even nanako on every petal
  • Chrysanthemum design with a large pierced tomoe and gold rinpō wheel
  • Dark, even original patina
  • Early work of the Ko-Kinkō school

Points to bear in mind

  • Unsigned: a school attribution, not a maker
  • The dating comes from the original seller and the style; the paper does not state it
  • Light mounting scuffs on the seppa-dai
  • Small sekigane in the central opening

Score breakdown

52.3/100

The score shares out 100 points: Maker 25 · Workmanship 20 · Condition 18 · Period 12 · Paper 10 · Extras 5 · Price 10. It is computed from the record, not from an opinion. Maker, workmanship, condition and period are judged from the photographs and the paper; price is compared only with fittings of the same type.

  1. Maker 9 of 25 Attributed to a school only
  2. Workmanship 10 of 20 Good work
  3. Condition 14 of 18 Good condition
  4. Period 11 of 12 Momoyama (1573–1615)
  5. Paper 4 of 10 NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon Tōsōgu
  6. Extras 0 of 5 No complete set by the same maker and no inscribed box
  7. Price 4.3 of 10 Rank 130 of 228 by price among pieces of its type, from the most affordable to the dearest