NH-0551 Rank 207

Tsuba · Kyō-sukashi

Iron openwork tsuba in chrysanthemum form, with linked ginkgo leaves and fine spokes, unsigned and attributed by the NBTHK to the Kyō-sukashi school, with Tokubetsu Hozon papers.

TsubaMomoyama (1573–1615)Momoyama to early Edo period (late 16th – 17th century)NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon Tōsōgu

Description

An unsigned tsuba attributed by its NBTHK paper to the 京透 (Kyō-sukashi) school, the iron openwork tradition that grew up in Kyoto and is valued for its elegance and balance. The paper titles it 菊花銀杏繋透鐔 (kikka ichō tsunagi sukashi tsuba): a guard with a chrysanthemum-flower outline whose outer ring links pierced ginkgo leaves, while an inner ring of fine, regular spokes converges on the seppa-dai. Two rounded hitsu-ana complete the scheme. The photographs show an iron plate with a polished surface (tetsu migaki-ji according to the paper), clean ji-sukashi piercing and a rounded mimi. The patina is dark and stable, with no visible active rust or breaks; the central opening carries copper sekigane at both ends, and one face of the seppa-dai retains fitting marks. The original seller places it between the Momoyama period and early Edo and states 83.9 × 82.05 mm, 4.15 mm thickness at the seppa-dai and 74.7 g, together with a paulownia box with no declared inscription. Paper 特別保存刀装具 (tokubetsu hozon tōsōgu) no. 225316, dated 28 February 2000.

Strong points

  • NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon paper visible in the photographs (no. 225316)
  • Geometric design of chrysanthemum and linked ginkgo leaves, typical of Kyō-sukashi
  • Fine, regular piercing with slender, well-balanced spokes
  • Iron with a dark, stable patina and no visible breaks

Points to bear in mind

  • Mumei: a school attribution, not a named maker
  • Copper sekigane in the central opening and fitting marks on one face of the seppa-dai
  • The dating comes from the original seller and the style; the paper does not state it

Score breakdown

55.9/100

The score shares out 100 points: Maker 25 · Workmanship 20 · Condition 18 · Period 12 · Paper 10 · Extras 5 · Price 10. It is computed from the record, not from an opinion. Maker, workmanship, condition and period are judged from the photographs and the paper; price is compared only with fittings of the same type.

  1. Maker 9 of 25 Attributed to a school only
  2. Workmanship 10 of 20 Good work
  3. Condition 14 of 18 Good condition
  4. Period 11 of 12 Momoyama (1573–1615)
  5. Paper 4 of 10 NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon Tōsōgu
  6. Extras 0 of 5 No complete set by the same maker and no inscribed box
  7. Price 7.9 of 10 Rank 49 of 228 by price among pieces of its type, from the most affordable to the dearest