NH-0700 Rank 331

Tsuba · Hayashi school

Unsigned iron mokkō-gata tsuba pierced in kage-sukashi with scattered crests, attributed by its NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon paper to the Hayashi school of Higo.

TsubaLate Edo (1781–1868)Edo period (17th–19th century)NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon Tōsōgu

Description

Unsigned iron tsuba of four-lobed mokkō-gata (木瓜形, mokkō-gata) shape with a rounded maru-mimi (丸耳, maru-mimi) rim. The NBTHK paper attributes it to the Hayashi school (林, Hayashi), the Higo lineage known for its cleanly drawn pierced ironwork. The design is a mon-chirashi, a scattering of family crests worked in kage-sukashi (陰透, kage-sukashi), in which each motif reads as a cut-out silhouette: at the top a plant motif with leafy sprigs; at the sides a double gourd, four-petalled flowers and a swirl; at the bottom a triple tomoe. The two half-moon hitsu-ana are open and carry thin strips of pale metal along their straight side. The photographs show both faces and oblique views of the edge: the iron keeps a dark brown-to-black patina with fine, stable pitting and no active red rust; the seppa-dai is lighter from handling wear and the central opening has small copper sekigane. The original seller gives 8.21 × 7.42 cm, 0.46 cm thickness and 116 g, and supplies it in a paulownia box. The paper is a Tokubetsu Hozon Tōsōgu (特別保存刀装具, tokubetsu hozon tōsōgu), no. 2005298, dated 16 November 2018, describing the piece as 紋散透鐔 (mon-chirashi-sukashi tsuba), 無銘 (mumei), 鉄地 (tetsuji).

Strong points

  • NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon Tōsōgu paper no. 2005298 (2018)
  • Attributed by the paper to the Hayashi school (林, Hayashi) of Higo
  • Kage-sukashi of scattered crests with clean cuts and a balanced layout
  • Iron with a stable dark patina, no active rust
  • Both faces and the edge well documented in the photographs

Points to bear in mind

  • Unsigned: a school attribution, not to a specific master
  • The seppa-dai shows the lightening typical of use
  • Copper sekigane in the central opening and pale metal strips in the hitsu-ana
  • The paper gives no date; the Edo sub-period cannot be pinned down

Score breakdown

48.3/100

The score shares out 100 points: Maker 25 · Workmanship 20 · Condition 18 · Period 12 · Paper 10 · Extras 5 · Price 10. It is computed from the record, not from an opinion. Maker, workmanship, condition and period are judged from the photographs and the paper; price is compared only with fittings of the same type.

  1. Maker 9 of 25 Attributed to a school only
  2. Workmanship 10 of 20 Good work
  3. Condition 14 of 18 Good condition
  4. Period 5 of 12 Late Edo (1781–1868)
  5. Paper 4 of 10 NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon Tōsōgu
  6. Extras 0 of 5 No complete set by the same maker and no inscribed box
  7. Price 6.3 of 10 Rank 86 of 228 by price among pieces of its type, from the most affordable to the dearest