NH-0923 Rank 113

Tsuba · Ko-Kinkō

Shakudō tsuba with a nanako ground and chrysanthemum sprays in sukidashi-bori, attributed by the paper to the Ko-Kinkō school; NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon certificate.

TsubaMuromachi or earlier (before 1573)Muromachi period (14th–16th century)NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon Tōsōgu

Description

Unsigned (mumei) tsuba of aori-gata shape, in deep black shakudō with a fine nanako ground which, as the photographs show, also covers the rim (mimi). The theme is the chrysanthemum (kiku-zu): sprays of open blossoms, leaves and buds rising from the rim and encircling the seppa-dai, worked in sukidashi-bori and joined to the mimi in nikubori. The NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon paper (no. 2010398, 19 December 2023) describes it as 菊図鐔 無銘 古金工 (kiku-zu tsuba mumei Ko-Kinkō), that is, a work of the early Ko-Kinkō metalsmiths. The broad seppa-dai and the shape of the hitsu-ana, one of them lobed, are consistent with an early piece; the original seller places it in the Muromachi period. The photographs show a well-preserved black patina, an intact nanako and crisp carving, with slight rubbing on a few high points where the copper tone shows through and the usual wear on the seppa-dai. The central ana carries copper sekigane. Declared dimensions: 66.7 × 60.2 mm, 6 mm thick, 153 g. According to the original seller, it comes with a fitted paulownia box.

Strong points

  • NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon paper attributing it to Ko-Kinkō
  • Black shakudō with nanako ground, extending onto the mimi
  • Chrysanthemums in sukidashi-bori, crisp and careful carving
  • Well-preserved original patina, no visible damage

Points to bear in mind

  • Unsigned: the Ko-Kinkō attribution comes from the paper, not from a signature
  • Copper sekigane in the central ana
  • Slight rubbing on a few high points, where the copper shows
  • The Muromachi dating is given by the original seller; the paper states no period

Score breakdown

60.2/100

The score shares out 100 points: Maker 25 · Workmanship 20 · Condition 18 · Period 12 · Paper 10 · Extras 5 · Price 10. It is computed from the record, not from an opinion. Maker, workmanship, condition and period are judged from the photographs and the paper; price is compared only with fittings of the same type.

  1. Maker 9 of 25 Attributed to a school only
  2. Workmanship 15 of 20 Notable work
  3. Condition 14 of 18 Good condition
  4. Period 12 of 12 Muromachi or earlier (before 1573)
  5. Paper 4 of 10 NBTHK Tokubetsu Hozon Tōsōgu
  6. Extras 0 of 5 No complete set by the same maker and no inscribed box
  7. Price 6.2 of 10 Rank 88 of 228 by price among pieces of its type, from the most affordable to the dearest