On this page
His designated blades and those in museums
| Work | Rank | Where it is | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tachi 太刀 銘久国 (tachi mei Hisakuni), formerly of the Matsudaira of Saijō (Iyo) | National Treasure (国宝, kokuhō) | Agency for Cultural Affairs, Tokyo | 80.4 cm, sori 3.0 cm; first half of the 13th century; no. 31 of the exhibition “Kyō no katana” (Kyoto National Museum, 2018) |
| Signed tachi, suriage | Imperial collection (gyobutsu) | Imperial collection | 66.7 cm |
| Tachi 太刀 銘久国 (tachi mei Hisakuni) | Important Cultural Property (重要文化財, jūyō bunkazai), since 29 August 1950 | Private collection | 78.4 cm, sori 1.6 cm; suriage |
| Tantō 短刀 銘久国 (tantō mei Hisakuni) | Important Cultural Property, since 29 August 1950 | Private collection | 20.1 cm; heirloom of the Matsudaira of Saijō, according to Sesko |
| Signed tantō, wide and long, with bōhi | Important Art Object (重要美術品, jūyō bijutsuhin) | Not recorded | 29.4 cm |
| Signed tachi, ubu, with a thick signature | Tokubetsu jūyō tōken (NBTHK) | Not recorded | 74.4 cm |
| Tantō 短刀 銘藤次郎久国 (tantō mei Tōjirō Hisakuni), heirloom of the Date, with bonji and suken | Jūyō tōken (NBTHK) | Not recorded | 22.4 cm |
| Tachi 太刀 銘藤次郎久国 (tachi mei Tōjirō Hisakuni), with a gold inlay by Shimazu Narinobu | Jūyō tōken (NBTHK) | Not recorded | 68.4 cm |
| Katana 刀 銘久国 (katana mei Hisakuni), shortened tachi, from the Tokugawa of Owari | No designation | Tokyo National Museum (F-8) | Signature kept as gakumei |
Two “Hisakuni” that are not his
There are two Important Cultural Properties bearing the name Hisakuni elsewhere: a tachi of the Itsukushima shrine, whose record says that the blade bears the signature Hisakuni, and a ken of the Nikkō Tōshōgū dated Kōan 3 (1280). Japanese Wikipedia says they are not by Awataguchi Hisakuni. The date of 1280 on the ken places it some eighty years after him.
In the treatises
The 『懐宝剣尺』 (Kaihō Kenjaku), of 1830, puts him in the highest grade of kotō for his artistic value; because of their rarity, no cutting tests were made with his blades, and their sharpness is unknown, according to Japanese Wikipedia. The sources consulted record no blade of his in the Kyōhō meibutsuchō (享保名物帳) or in the wazamono lists.